Monday, December 03, 2007

SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF

I think most of us are familiar with the term suspension of disbelief, which can be defined as the semi-conscious decision of a reader to put aside their beliefs, and accept the premise of a story as being real/possible. Or engaging in another world, like in a fantasy/sci fi, altogether. For the duration of a book, the reader is willing to believe things that are otherwise unbelieveable. The same can be said for movies.

Recently, I picked up the book Second Glance, by Jodi Picoult. It was written about 5 years ago, and although I'd read and loved her other books, I never wanted to read this one because of the supernatural element. I figured that since I don't believe in ghosts, there's no way I'd buy into this story. The only reason I actually took the time to read it was because I enjoy the way Picoult uses language, and also the way she tackles gray/controversial issues from several angles. So I decided to give it a whirl.

This book drew me in to the point where I was looking over my shoulder and had to read with my back against a wall. I was sucked into the story and became wholly involved with the characters, going so far as to believe their experiences. When I finally sat the book down, I had to ask myself, why? Was it the blending of the real world (Vermont setting, historical facts, etc) with the paranormal that caused me to suspend my disbelief? What, exactly, pulled me through a story I had been reluctant to read?

So I thought and thought about it, and determined that part of what made me "believe" was the skilled use of detail. In Writing for the Soul, Jerry B. Jenkins agrees, saying that reader buy in can be positively or negatively affected by well-researched details. In Writing the Breakout Novel, Donald Maass says that breakout thriller writers master the detailing that creates plausibility--which can really be applied across genres.

This is a skill I need to learn, especially since I'm not a huge detail writer, as I know some of you are =)

My question to you is, as you read a book, what causes you to suspend your disbelief?

5 comments:

Erica Vetsch said...

The 'other world' has to be seemless. If anything jars me out of the story world, I become more of a skeptic.

Betsy Ann said...

I agree with Erica! Also, for me, its that what-if factor. Like I KNOW its not real and couldn't happen, but if its on the veeery edge of something that IS possible, its even better!! I like when writers tie fictional elements into real elements, like you said your post - a certain setting or time frame, etc. When the core of the book IS real, then the fictional, fake part seems to be presented as a possibility - and even though deep inside you know better, you still can't help but get that shiver of "what if". And that's in anything, not just thriller or fantasy or suspense. Movie wise, I would give the example of National Treasure - we know there's not a secret invisible map on the back of the Declaration of Independence, but then again....do we really know that? =P

Georgiana said...

I agree, story world has to be done accurately. LOL, National Treasure!! What if? What do we really know???

Mary said...

Been catching up on your posts, G! Hate it when my real life is too busy for keeping up with everybody!

Believability...when the author proves to be more knowledgeable than me about their subject, I just relax and enjoy. I love learning about new things/different perspectives, etc. As far as paranormal stuff, it still boils down to: have they done their research? Can they con me scientifically into giving their theories credit?

Great question!

CresceNet said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Add to Technorati Favorites